The risk assessment takes into consideration the following financial and programmatic factors:
- Total dollar amount of grant award
- Timeliness of financial reporting to DCJS
- Results of a Single-Audit
- Date of most recent site visit
- Timeliness of programmatic progress reporting to DCJS
- Turnover of DCJS-funded key staff
- Duration of sub-grantee’s grant experience.
- Other issues of non-compliance and recurring or unresolved issues
A weighted numeric value is assigned to each factor, with higher numbers indicating higher risk. Based on the total risk score, sub-grantees will be placed in the risk categories of high, moderate, or low. A score of six or lower is low risk. A score of seven to thirteen is medium risk. A score of 14 or greater is high risk. A sub-grantee's risk level may be adjusted to a higher level based on additional information that DCJS is aware of, including results of other grant monitoring from partner agencies, financial instability, results from previous site visits, recurring or unresolved issues, concerns about internal controls, and financial management issues. These concerns should be documented on the Grant Monitoring Risk Assessment Tool. A completed copy of the risk assessment will be kept in the sub-grantee’s file.
|
|
|
Records pertinent to the award must be retained for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report. Sub-grantees must provide access, including performance measurement information, in addition to the financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and other pertinent records indicated in 2 C.F.R. 200.333. A file shall be kept on each sub-award. The file should reflect the sub-award number and should at least contain the following:
- Supporting documentation of any expenditures pertaining to this sub-award (i.e., original receipts, invoices, etc.);
- Documentation of employee and volunteer timesheets pertaining to the sub-award;
- Signed copies of any contract supported by the sub-award;
- Documentation for sub-award matching funds;
- Indirect cost rate;
- Property records of equipment purchased with grant funds, including serial numbers; and
- Other pertinent information (i.e., correspondence with DCJS, budget revisions, special conditions, etc.)
|
|
|
For sub-grantees determined to be high risk, DCJS staff will conduct an on-site monitoring visit annually. For sub-grantees determined to be medium risk, DCJS staff will conduct on-site monitoring every two years. For sub-grantees determined to be low risk, DCJS staff will conduct a site visit every four years. Site visits can take place more frequently depending upon identified fiscal or programmatic deficiencies or other indicators of non-compliance.
|
|
|
The subgrantee must authorize DCJS and its representatives, access to and the right to examine all records related to all grants. This includes promptly providing, upon request, financial or programmatic-related documentation related to this award, including documentation of expenditures and activities performed with awarded funds. Records must be maintained onsite physically and/or electronically.
|
|
|
The Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) ensures that sub-grantees comply with all grant conditions. The department develops a risk-based monitoring plan, and conducts fiscal and programmatic monitoring on all sub-grantees, including enhanced monitoring of sub-grantees determined to be medium and high risk.
The Director of DCJS has the authority, under Chapter 1 of Title 9.1, Code of Virginia (§§9-100 through 186.14), to implement policies needed for the operation of the Agency. Grant Monitors and the Grants Administration Staff are responsible for monitoring the activities of sub-grantees to ensure that awards are used for authorized purposes and comply with 2 C.F.R. §§ 200.303 and 200.331, along with other federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the awards. The DCJS grant solicitation, subsequent application, and statement of grant award (SOGA) contain all of the required information listed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.331(a).
|
|
|
Prior to the site visits, the Grant Monitor will send a formal notification letter at least 30 calendar days before the visit to confirm dates and scope of review; provide details of documentation needed for the review; specify expected timeframe for the review; and ensure key officials are available during the visit. The Grant Monitor will also provide the sub-grantee with the Items for Review Checklist (located on the Victims Services page: https://www.dcjs.virginia.gov/victims-services/forms) and request that supporting documentation be compiled by the start of the visit.
During the review, the Grant Monitor will complete the sub-grantee Monitoring Tool and address noted concerns with the sub-grantee. The Grant Monitor will track each step followed during the review process, document conversations with sub-grantee staff, and inspect the progress of the project/program. At the end of the on-site monitoring visit, the Grant Monitor will meet with key officials to present the tentative findings noted from the financial review. After the on-site monitoring visit, the Grant Monitor will issue a Post-Review Letter to the sub-grantee within 60 calendar days documenting recommendations for corrective action and requiring the submission of a corrective action plan within 45 calendar days by the sub-grantee, if necessary.
|
|
|
When material risk is identified in a sub-recipient’s organization or project, 2 CFR 200.331 requires pass-through entities to implement risk management tools to ensure proper accountability, compliance with program requirements, and achievement of performance goals. Examples of available risk management tools include:
- Providing sub-recipients with training and technical assistance on program related matters.
- More frequent monitoring of programmatic aims or invoices.
- More frequent communication with PI.
- On-site review of the sub-recipient’s program operations.
- Stringent review of audits and prompt action when instances of non-compliance are identified.
- Enforcement action for non-compliance, including temporary withholding of payments, disallowing a cost when all or part of the cost is non-compliant, wholly or partially suspending or terminating the sub-award, withholding further funds from the project, or any other legally available remedies.
|
|
|
A risk assessment is completed by the Grant Monitor before the grant award period begins and/or annually to inform the monitoring plan for the following fiscal year. Grant Monitors will complete a risk assessment using the Grant Monitoring Risk Assessment, which meets the required elements in 2 CFR 200.331(b), to evaluate each sub-grantee’s risk of non-compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the award to determine the appropriate level and schedule of sub-grantee monitoring.
|
|
|
Monitoring is the process of reviewing, with staff of a grant-funded project, the project’s implementation, activities, performance, and expenditures to determine if it is operating as proposed in the approved grant application and in accordance with grant requirements and conditions, as well as any applicable regulatory requirements, and to identify any technical assistance needs of the grant recipient. Monitoring may include review of the fiscal and programmatic aspects of a grant-funded project. The term “monitoring” is used to describe both the broad overall system of reviewing and tracking the use of federal and state funds, and the more specific day-to-day review processes to assure that a particular sub-grantee complies with federal or state rules and regulations, and is meeting the goals and objectives of the grant.
|
|
|
Grant Monitors:
- Review quarterly financial and programmatic reports required by DCJS.
- Follow-up with sub-grantees and ensure that sub-grantees take timely and appropriate action on all deficiencies pertaining to the grant award detected through audits, on- site monitoring visits, desk reviews, and other monitoring activities.
- Conduct trainings and/or provide technical assistance for sub-grantees to help administer the grant.
- Evaluate any newly revealed information that may affect sub-grantees’ risk score and modify the monitoring plan as necessary.
- Perform pre-award review based on the questionnaire to determine the fitness of sub- grantees to receive new grant funds, or perform a risk assessment.
- Coordinate with the DCJS Grants Management Section for the issuance of management decisions for audit findings relating to DCJS grant funding.
- Conduct on-site monitoring visits of sub-grantees to ensure financial and programmatic compliance.
|
|
|
Grants Administration Staff will:
- Ensure entity is not debarred (see Debarred or Suspended Procedure and Policy) prior to award and periodically during the award period.
- Analyze audit findings for sub-grantees that are required under 2 CFR § 200.332 (f) to have a completed audit.
- Verify that audits are conducted for sub-grantees that are required under 2 CFR § 200.332 (f) to be audited (“when it is expected that the sub-grantee’s Federal awards expended during the respective fiscal year equaled or exceeded the $750,000 threshold set forth in 2 CFR §200.501 Audit requirements”).
- Conduct fiscal desk reviews and on-site monitoring visits based on requests from the grant monitors or coordinators.
- Conduct in-depth financial reviews of programs identified during the fiscal desk reviews and on-site monitoring visits as needing further review.
- Determine corrective action required of the sub-grantee if there are concerns in the audit finding, fiscal desk reviews, or on-site monitoring visits. Work with the Grant Monitor to communicate concerns to the sub-grantee and monitor compliance with corrective action plans.
- Issue management decisions for audit findings relating to DCJS grant funding.
- Enter sub-sub-grantee into FFATA if an award is over $25,000 (see FFATA Policy).
|
|
|